[新聞] The World's 10 Most Dangerous Airlines

看板Aviation (航空板)作者 (teddybear)時間13年前 (2013/01/24 07:35), 編輯推噓29(29017)
留言46則, 28人參與, 最新討論串1/1
The World's 10 Most Dangerous Airlines Alex Davies Jan. 22, 2013, 12:18 PM Flying was less deadly in 2012 than in any year since 1945, but that does not mean all airlines are equally safe. The Jet Airliner Crash Data Evaluation Centre (JACDEC), which collects information about aviation accidents and safety, has published its annual Airline Safety Ranking. The ratings take into account the number and deadliness of the hull losses (destroyed airplanes) they have suffered in the past 30 years, how they have fared more recently, and how many flights they have flown without incident. The results do not take into account the cause of the hull losses, or whether the airline is at fault, so they are not a perfect measure of how safely an airline behaves. Of 60 ranked airlines, here are the 10 with the worst safety records, including the number of hull losses since 1983, and how many fatalities they caused: #10 SkyWest Airlines: 3 hull losses; 22 dead #9 South African Airways: 1 hull loss; 159 dead #8 Thai Airways International: 5 hull losses; 309 dead #7 Turkish Airlines: 6 hull losses, 188 dead #6 Saudia: 4 hull losses; 310 dead #5 Korean Air: 9 hull losses; 687 dead #4 GOL Transportes Aéreos: 1 hull loss; 154 dead #3 Air India: 3 hull losses; 329 dead #2 TAM Airlines: 6 hull losses; 336 dead #1 China Airlines: 8 hull losses; 755 dead Update: This post has been updated to clarify how JACDEC produces its safety rankings. www.businessinsider.com/the-worlds-10-most-dangerous-airlines-2013-1 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 108.7.164.215

01/24 07:37, , 1F
噗噗...應該一下子就會被台灣媒體拿去報了..
01/24 07:37, 1F

01/24 07:46, , 2F
恭喜 華航拿下冠軍
01/24 07:46, 2F

01/24 08:08, , 3F
下面有人分享俄國航空更可怕 害死一千五百多人
01/24 08:08, 3F

01/24 08:09, , 4F
AA加起來的人數也不遑多讓
01/24 08:09, 4F

01/24 08:11, , 5F
01/24 08:11, 5F

01/24 08:31, , 6F
過不久就可以看到台灣媒體"您知道嗎 最危險的航空公司...."
01/24 08:31, 6F

01/24 08:52, , 7F
要被大作文章了
01/24 08:52, 7F

01/24 09:09, , 8F
某K表示:
01/24 09:09, 8F

01/24 09:23, , 9F
某K的粉絲還真多~~
01/24 09:23, 9F

01/24 10:11, , 10F
覺得危險的人就不要飛就好啦...
01/24 10:11, 10F

01/24 10:35, , 11F
晚點就要上新聞囉~
01/24 10:35, 11F

01/24 10:53, , 12F
CI 歷史共業吧 CI611之後改善超多 之前CI120是被波音婊
01/24 10:53, 12F

01/24 11:03, , 13F
反正台灣妓者腦殘只會上PTT抄新聞,很快就會被證實了
01/24 11:03, 13F

01/24 11:18, , 14F
會抄嗎?一來是英文,二來華航會買廣告.....
01/24 11:18, 14F

01/24 11:37, , 15F
新聞大概一定會上的XDDD 記者應該很缺新聞
01/24 11:37, 15F

01/24 11:39, , 16F
花行的公關能力....某航在一旁表示:
01/24 11:39, 16F

01/24 11:40, , 17F
隨便一看.. 很多重大空難的歐美日公司都不在上面
01/24 11:40, 17F

01/24 11:41, , 18F
隨便一次單一事故都死亡數十人.. 累計死22人竟然排第10
01/24 11:41, 18F

01/24 11:55, , 19F
印尼跟菲律賓也蠻常摔的!
01/24 11:55, 19F

01/24 12:15, , 20F
日航也沒進榜啊...
01/24 12:15, 20F

01/24 12:28, , 21F
我到JACDEC的網站看了下 它是用所有歷史資料去分析
01/24 12:28, 21F

01/24 12:29, , 22F
沒有考慮到近期的表現 這難以反映近期的飛安狀況吧
01/24 12:29, 22F

01/24 12:29, , 23F
弄這種統計到底有什麼意義
01/24 12:29, 23F

01/24 12:30, , 24F
JACDEC是該篇報導的引用出處
01/24 12:30, 24F

01/24 12:35, , 25F
補推 它是用了30年來的紀錄 但似乎有selection bias
01/24 12:35, 25F

01/24 12:37, , 26F
因為它根本只考慮60間航空公司(大部分是已開發國家)
01/24 12:37, 26F

01/24 12:39, , 27F
SAS#50 SQ#30 UA#31 TG#53 CA#43 TK#54 LX#33
01/24 12:39, 27F

01/24 12:39, , 28F
星盟飛安有這麼糟就是了 (排前面的都是OW)
01/24 12:39, 28F

01/24 12:47, , 29F
照死亡人數排的話JAL123五百多人應該要排第二吧= ="
01/24 12:47, 29F

01/24 12:51, , 30F
奇怪 第五名的掉落架次跟死亡人數都比234高..為啥第五
01/24 12:51, 30F

01/24 13:40, , 31F
神秘的排名又被Business Insider拿去炒作= =
01/24 13:40, 31F

01/24 13:43, , 32F
這老美記者看似有見獵心喜的針對性 但是鞭錯國籍...下面還
01/24 13:43, 32F

01/24 13:46, , 33F
有人好心回覆說 如果是以百萬或億計的乘客人次來統計 數據
01/24 13:46, 33F

01/24 13:46, , 34F
意義不大
01/24 13:46, 34F

01/24 14:07, , 35F
我也覺得奇怪 到底他指數怎麼算的 是罹難人數嗎?
01/24 14:07, 35F

01/24 14:08, , 36F
看起來一點都不像.... 失事架次也不是
01/24 14:08, 36F

01/24 14:56, , 37F
JAL不只摔123吧 看不沉的太陽裡面就摔了好幾架DC-8
01/24 14:56, 37F

01/24 18:10, , 38F
現在tvbs晚間新聞已經在報導了!
01/24 18:10, 38F

01/24 19:27, , 39F
數字版看到新聞了= =
01/24 19:27, 39F

01/24 19:45, , 40F
這家我真的不敢坐 但不知道為啥台灣人很愛
01/24 19:45, 40F

01/24 22:09, , 41F
因為有些人是看事實現況,有些人只記得過去的歷史紀錄
01/24 22:09, 41F

01/24 22:16, , 42F
這排名完全莫名其妙....
01/24 22:16, 42F

01/24 22:20, , 43F
Shaq32大指的是哪一家不敢坐呀??
01/24 22:20, 43F

01/24 22:21, , 44F
這十年來華航的評價不錯,主要是做了哪些改變啊?
01/24 22:21, 44F

01/25 01:19, , 45F
去學長學帝雉 落實考核淘汰 KE也是
01/25 01:19, 45F

01/25 09:00, , 46F
"學長"學"帝雉" 是故意打錯的嗎XDD
01/25 09:00, 46F
文章代碼(AID): #1H07EixV (Aviation)
文章代碼(AID): #1H07EixV (Aviation)