[新聞] 國泰再度考慮是否引進747-8I或A380

看板Aviation (航空板)作者 (文人相輕自古皆然)時間13年前 (2013/02/04 23:36), 編輯推噓12(12010)
留言22則, 9人參與, 最新討論串1/1
這一則不是舊聞也不是OP,而是國泰內心小劇場。 1.國泰CEO史樂山先生表示,2013上半年國泰將會決定到底要不要引進747-8或A380。 2.因為國泰將在今年年底前出清747-400,在有slot限制的倫敦線,沒大飛機不行。 3.雖然之前國泰很喜歡77W很能裝的鮪魚肚,但改款後的A380好像看起來也不錯。 4.史樂山也表示,747-8F是非常棒的貨機。 5.國泰並未透露將購買幾架VLA。 6.史樂山認為波音目前只有空管787的問題,777X應該是分身乏術。 Cathay Evaluating Widebody Needs, Considering A380s And 747-8s By Leithen Francis Source: Aviation Daily February 01, 2013 Cathay Pacific CEO John Slosar tells Aviation Week the airline is evaluating the Airbus A380 and Boeing 747-8 and expects to make a decision on whether to place an order for passenger variants in the first half of 2013. Cathay will have phased out most of its 747-400 passenger aircraft by the end of the year, and has to deal with slot constraints at London Heathrow Airport and Hong Kong International Airport, Slosar says. And while his predecessor found cost inefficiencies with the A380 and preferred the cargo capacity of the 777-300ER, Slosar notes that the maximum takeoff weight of aircraft like the A380 changes as improvements are made to the aircraft. Slosar also acknowledges that the 747-8 freighters already operating in Cathay ’s fleet “are operating very well as freighters.” He did not say how many aircraft Cathay will need. The CEO anticipates that Boeing’s immediate problems with the 787 program may inadvertently delay the unveiling of the airframer’s 777X. He had earlier predicted that Boeing would officially launch the 777X program in the first half of 2013, but in light of recent problems with the 787 program he says he may have to change his prediction. Slosar reasons that the need to devote engineering resources to resolve problems with the 787’s lithium-ion batteries will divert attention from the next generation of the 777. “I haven’t heard anything recently about the 777X,” Cathay’s CEO tells Aviation Week on the sidelines of an event marking Malaysia Airlines’ entry into Oneworld. As for the 787 program, Slosar expects the current problems will be resolved. “There’s been a bit of a stumble, but I don’t have any doubts that they [Boeing] will get this fixed. Boeing is a world-class company that knows what they are doing.” http://www.aviationweek.com/Article.aspx?id=/article-xml/avd_02_01_2013_p03-01 -543373.xml http://0rz.tw/cMNKR 以目前訂購747-8I的航空公司來看, LH根本沒飛台灣, KE/CA也不太可能拿來飛台灣, 只好期待CX下單再以EQV的身份讓大家開福袋了。 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 114.33.221.3

02/04 23:48, , 1F
國泰那塗裝塗上380感覺好醜...
02/04 23:48, 1F

02/04 23:51, , 2F
我比較期待塗上壁虎王
02/04 23:51, 2F

02/05 00:02, , 3F
壁虎王...期待他買A358或A359吧 反倒是CI可以考慮買748I
02/05 00:02, 3F

02/05 00:11, , 4F
為什麼748i還會有人買?四發不是比較耗油嗎..
02/05 00:11, 4F

02/05 00:12, , 5F
倒是壁虎王..不再買廣體機了嗎?!好奇..
02/05 00:12, 5F

02/05 00:14, , 6F
748I油耗只比77W多一點點,運量卻可以高達五百多人
02/05 00:14, 6F

02/05 00:15, , 7F
對很多航空公司而言 A380太大了 77W又太小了阿
02/05 00:15, 7F

02/05 00:15, , 8F
可是CI卻一點都沒有考慮..連BR也是
02/05 00:15, 8F

02/05 00:16, , 9F
CI是因為有些744還很年輕吧 等要汰換最後的744就會考慮了吧
02/05 00:16, 9F

02/05 00:54, , 10F
德航有精算過,747-8I裝得滿的話,跟77W營運起來不會比較差
02/05 00:54, 10F

02/05 00:57, , 11F
747-8I 長相跟744差不多~耗油低很多的原因是在哪呀?
02/05 00:57, 11F

02/05 00:57, , 12F
材質嗎? 比較輕? 還是?
02/05 00:57, 12F

02/05 01:03, , 13F
747改裝兩顆GE90推力差不多一樣...省油 (發抖)
02/05 01:03, 13F

02/05 01:08, , 14F
新的機翼,發動機,和更多的酬載
02/05 01:08, 14F

02/05 01:25, , 15F
跪求CX買A380飛TPE(跪)
02/05 01:25, 15F

02/05 01:27, , 16F
"改款後"的A380是指什麼呀~
02/05 01:27, 16F

02/05 01:37, , 17F
MTOW增加
02/05 01:37, 17F

02/05 08:34, , 18F
每個廠商都會說自己的新產品省油,但最可靠的還是同業
02/05 08:34, 18F

02/05 08:34, , 19F
操作實績。
02/05 08:34, 19F

02/05 08:38, , 20F
另一方面,380就算增加MTOW,lower deck的容積還是一樣,
02/05 08:38, 20F

02/05 08:38, , 21F
這仍然是弱點。
02/05 08:38, 21F

02/05 18:18, , 22F
但現在貨運這麼差,買A380坐多一點人也許比較實際?
02/05 18:18, 22F
文章代碼(AID): #1H3zLwvv (Aviation)
文章代碼(AID): #1H3zLwvv (Aviation)