Fw: [提問]低調裝傻?無能?馬航MH370與監偵科技涵量
本來想在軍武版請教各位大大，想說馬航MH370
在aviation版也討論蠻多的，所以也順便來請教各位大大
閒聊閒聊，增廣見識.....
※ [本文轉錄自 Military 看板 #1J8mdqPR ]
作者: cyp0917 (CYP0917) 看板: Military
標題: [提問]低調裝傻?無能?監偵科技涵量與馬航MH370
時間: Fri Mar 14 21:53:54 2014
板上的前輩，可以聊聊當今的監偵科技涵量嗎？
the state-of-art technology…
雷達跟衛星在監測飛行物的能力如何？
反彈道飛彈系統的早期預警？
高解析度的衛星？
http://military.china.com/jqsj/017/
各國軍方的雷達？
還是這區域不是美國重要部署的區域？
難道一台飛機就這樣不見？
謝謝各位前輩...
※ 編輯: cyp0917 來自: 42.66.82.164 (03/14 21:59)
推
03/14 22:24, , 1F
03/14 22:24, 1F
推
03/15 00:08, , 2F
03/15 00:08, 2F
→
03/15 02:06, , 3F
03/15 02:06, 3F
→
03/15 02:10, , 4F
03/15 02:10, 4F
→
03/15 02:10, , 5F
03/15 02:10, 5F
→
03/15 02:11, , 6F
03/15 02:11, 6F
就是有潛射，所以這應該是全球性的部署？
http://goo.gl/6vvTv2
The NRO's infrared satellites look for the heat signatures of missile launches
"around the world", and could potentially see a plane exploded in mid air.
According to The New York Times, the US Department of Defense
"has checked" the surveillance data and "found" no evidence of an explosion.
→
03/15 02:13, , 7F
03/15 02:13, 7F
→
03/15 02:13, , 8F
03/15 02:13, 8F
→
03/15 02:14, , 9F
03/15 02:14, 9F
推
03/15 02:54, , 10F
03/15 02:54, 10F
→
03/15 02:54, , 11F
03/15 02:54, 11F
→
03/15 02:55, , 12F
03/15 02:55, 12F
※ 編輯: cyp0917 來自: 42.66.82.164 (03/15 03:05)
→
03/15 13:32, , 13F
03/15 13:32, 13F
→
03/15 13:33, , 14F
03/15 13:33, 14F
→
03/15 13:34, , 15F
03/15 13:34, 15F
→
03/15 13:36, , 16F
03/15 13:36, 16F
→
03/15 13:37, , 17F
03/15 13:37, 17F
→
03/15 13:38, , 18F
03/15 13:38, 18F
請教樓上大大，您是個人臆測？還是有他們的protocol, handbook或是準則
有任何reference? 我會試著在google一下美國NORAD 跟NRO的資料再看看...
※ 編輯: cyp0917 來自: 220.139.162.106 (03/15 14:58)
→
03/16 11:02, , 19F
03/16 11:02, 19F
→
03/16 11:03, , 20F
03/16 11:03, 20F
Aviation 近期熱門文章
PTT美食旅遊區 即時熱門文章