[新聞] 紐約直升機墜毀哈德遜河 3大人3小孩過世

看板Aviation (航空板)作者 (Like Heart Break)時間5天前 (2025/04/11 06:35), 編輯推噓25(25046)
留言71則, 28人參與, 1天前最新討論串1/1
[新聞來源/日期] CNN [新聞標題] 3 adults, 3 children dead after passenger helicopter crashes in the Hudson River [內文] 三名大人 包含駕駛 以及三名小孩 已經被證實在今天紐約的直升機意外中身亡 x(推特)上面有很多影片 就不Po了 請直接搜尋Helicopter就找得到 非常可怕 在空中主螺旋槳跟機身尾部就已經脫離飛機了 整個機身就像一塊鉛球一樣直接撞向哈德遜河 完全沒有生還的可能 螺旋槳幾秒鐘後也墜落河面 看來不是失去動力 這麼可怕的直升機墜毀還是第一次看到 也有人拍出來墜毀前的直升機就有在做一些很誇張的動作 不知道是機師故意 還是機械已經有狀況了 Six people – including three children – are dead after a passenger helicopter crashed into the Hudson River, said New York City Mayor Eric Adams. The passengers included a pilot and a family visiting from Spain, he said. The NYPD reported the crash at Pier 40 at 3:17 p.m. The helicopter is currently submerged in the river. “Due to a helicopter crash in the Hudson River, in the vicinity of the West Side Highway and Spring Street, expect emergency vehicles and traffic delays in the surrounding areas,” the NYPD said earlier in a social media post. FlightRadar24 reported the aircraft to be a Bell 206L-4 LongRanger IV, based on ADS-B tracking data. It was built in 2004 and had an airworthiness certificate issued in 2016 that was good until 2029, according to Federal Aviation Administration records. The helicopter flew for about 16 minutes before going down into the water, according to analysis by CNN and flight tracking site FlightRadar 24. The flight path shows the aircraft took off from lower Manhattan and did a circle near the Statue of Liberty before flying up the Hudson River to the George Washington Bridge at about 1000 feet. At that point it turned back south, ultimately coming to rest in the water near New Jersey. The path up the Hudson is a popular sightseeing route. When the helicopter crashed, it was cloudy with winds around 10 to 15 mph with gusts up to 25 mph according to various weather reports in the area. Visibility at the surface was good — 10 miles — but it was cloudy as a system is moving into the region, bringing light rain to the region this afternoon and evening. The Federal Aviation Administration confirmed it is investigating the situation alongside the National Transportation Safety Board. The NTSB is leading the investigation and will provide updates. “A Bell 206 helicopter crashed and is submerged in the Hudson River in New York City,” the FAA said in a statement. [原文連結] https://edition.cnn.com/2025/04/10/us/hudson-river-helicopter-crash/index.html -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.34.218.61 (臺灣) ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Aviation/M.1744324557.A.948.htmlblanka:轉錄至看板 Gossiping 04/11 06:41

04/11 07:46, 5天前 , 1F
尾翼跟螺旋槳與機身分離耶...
04/11 07:46, 1F

04/11 08:17, 5天前 , 2F
主璇自己切到自己 就這樣
04/11 08:17, 2F

04/11 08:37, 5天前 , 3F

04/11 10:01, 5天前 , 4F
真絕望的死法
04/11 10:01, 4F

04/11 11:14, 5天前 , 5F
西門子 西班牙隊CEO一家人 RIP
04/11 11:14, 5F

04/11 11:47, 5天前 , 6F
之前南韓好像有一架直升機也是螺旋槳分離
04/11 11:47, 6F

04/11 12:30, 5天前 , 7F
這些直升機操蠻兇的..之前坐在pier 6 heliport對面的廣
04/11 12:30, 7F

04/11 12:32, 5天前 , 8F
場看他們起降..有時甚至沒休息..一組下機立刻就一組上機
04/11 12:32, 8F

04/11 12:46, 5天前 , 9F
太慘了
04/11 12:46, 9F

04/11 13:21, 5天前 , 10F
R.I.P.
04/11 13:21, 10F

04/11 13:27, 5天前 , 11F
R.I.P
04/11 13:27, 11F

04/11 15:35, 5天前 , 12F
看完這新聞 去大峽谷不敢體驗直昇機了 Q_Q
04/11 15:35, 12F

04/11 17:00, 5天前 , 13F
直升機這種東西還是不要全家一起比較好
04/11 17:00, 13F

04/11 17:32, 5天前 , 14F
R.I.P,有的人是不能接受人家花我保險金打我小孩
04/11 17:32, 14F

04/11 18:42, 5天前 , 15F
這看了有夠可怕的會不敢搭直升機…
04/11 18:42, 15F

04/11 19:02, 5天前 , 16F
原本才想去東京搭看夜景...
04/11 19:02, 16F

04/11 19:35, 5天前 , 17F
幾十年前 飛機不那麼安全的時候,有些富豪家庭坐飛機也
04/11 19:35, 17F

04/11 19:35, 5天前 , 18F
會故意分別坐不同班
04/11 19:35, 18F

04/11 20:06, 5天前 , 19F

04/11 20:06, 5天前 , 20F
三年前的看起來是同型機 一樣切掉尾巴
04/11 20:06, 20F

04/11 20:06, 5天前 , 21F

04/11 20:22, 5天前 , 22F
美國2025的飛安到底怎麼了,一連串欸。
04/11 20:22, 22F

04/11 20:22, 5天前 , 23F
剛剛才看到新聞,DCA也發生碰撞事故…
04/11 20:22, 23F

04/11 20:43, 5天前 , 24F
看來以後CEO可能要自己準備一架了 確保不會被操太
04/11 20:43, 24F

04/11 20:43, 5天前 , 25F
04/11 20:43, 25F

04/11 23:10, 5天前 , 26F
這設計主旋翼會切到機身還可以拿適航認證喔...
04/11 23:10, 26F

04/12 01:41, 4天前 , 27F
19F的新聞中事故的直升機是Robinson R44,這次是Be
04/12 01:41, 27F

04/12 01:41, 4天前 , 28F
ll 206,型號不同而去差異滿大的
04/12 01:41, 28F

04/12 03:08, 4天前 , 29F
墜機地點離我朋友家直線200公尺..鄰居大多是(富有)亞裔
04/12 03:08, 29F

04/12 03:09, 4天前 , 30F
Newport蠻多人在家中目擊直升機摔下去
04/12 03:09, 30F

04/12 03:11, 4天前 , 31F
河邊那個塑像現在看來真的很諷刺
04/12 03:11, 31F

04/12 12:39, 4天前 , 32F
這種經濟社會動盪的時候搭飛機自己分散風險吧 機師也只是領
04/12 12:39, 32F

04/12 12:39, 4天前 , 33F
薪水的奴隸 生活出狀況難保會有人帶你一起下去
04/12 12:39, 33F

04/12 17:03, 4天前 , 34F
直升機真的有夠危險
04/12 17:03, 34F

04/12 17:03, 4天前 , 35F
這幾年太多政商名流都是因為直升機走的
04/12 17:03, 35F

04/12 21:42, 4天前 , 36F
那請問樓上,又有多少政商名流是搭定翼機送命的?
04/12 21:42, 36F

04/12 21:49, 4天前 , 37F
直升機也是美國總統的交通工具之一,他們幕僚有那麼傻嗎?
04/12 21:49, 37F

04/12 23:28, 4天前 , 38F
直升機確實就是比較危險,用數據來看不就一清二楚了?
04/12 23:28, 38F

04/12 23:29, 4天前 , 39F
事故率每10萬小時約4.7,致命事故率則是0.7
04/12 23:29, 39F

04/12 23:30, 4天前 , 40F
你要用感覺去認為直升機很安全隨便你,但不用想說服其
04/12 23:30, 40F

04/12 23:30, 4天前 , 41F
他人
04/12 23:30, 41F

04/13 00:00, 4天前 , 42F
先天條件就不對等,你用數據比較只是更顯無知。今天如果
04/13 00:00, 42F

04/13 00:00, 4天前 , 43F
直升機跟定翼機一起飛相同的高度及路線、用同樣素質的飛
04/13 00:00, 43F

04/13 00:00, 4天前 , 44F
行員、公司肯花一樣的錢來保修飛機及執行SMS系統,如果直
04/13 00:00, 44F

04/13 00:00, 4天前 , 45F
升機出事率還是比較高我就服你。
04/13 00:00, 45F

04/13 00:04, 4天前 , 46F
就像一堆人說機車危險,所以要禁行機車。那是因為你把機
04/13 00:04, 46F

04/13 00:04, 4天前 , 47F
車都逼到只能走慢車道,路邊一堆違停、卸貨、還有開車門
04/13 00:04, 47F

04/13 00:04, 4天前 , 48F
不長眼的三寶,最後再強制你要去「待撞區」轉彎,呵呵
04/13 00:04, 48F

04/13 00:27, 3天前 , 49F
原來是路權仔
04/13 00:27, 49F

04/13 00:29, 3天前 , 50F
那就你說的都對
04/13 00:29, 50F

04/13 00:49, 3天前 , 51F
呵呵,一味的說某個東西危險只會製造恐慌,沒有好好去了
04/13 00:49, 51F

04/13 00:49, 3天前 , 52F
解事實才是最恐怖的。
04/13 00:49, 52F

04/13 00:58, 3天前 , 53F
用政商名流搭機的出事率來檢討某方,就不是用自我感覺來
04/13 00:58, 53F

04/13 00:58, 3天前 , 54F
說服?真是雙標啊呵呵
04/13 00:58, 54F

04/13 08:26, 3天前 , 55F
哈拉一大堆,就是拿不出數據反擊
04/13 08:26, 55F

04/13 08:27, 3天前 , 56F
你就繼續「感覺」直升機沒有比較危險,我沒差啊,但你
04/13 08:27, 56F

04/13 08:27, 3天前 , 57F
不要再說服別人了好不好,沒人在乎你的意見
04/13 08:27, 57F

04/13 11:20, 3天前 , 58F
你要看數據為什麼不自己去翻一翻失事報告?拿國內外最近
04/13 11:20, 58F

04/13 11:20, 3天前 , 59F
兩例:美國Kobe和台灣參謀總長,都是因為pilot error導致
04/13 11:20, 59F

04/13 11:20, 3天前 , 60F
失事,跟直升機有何關?這些飛行員去飛cessna也是一樣會
04/13 11:20, 60F

04/13 11:20, 3天前 , 61F
在同樣的天氣下CFIT。多看報告甚至去國外飛飛也好,你會
04/13 11:20, 61F

04/13 11:20, 3天前 , 62F
發現跟你想的不一樣
04/13 11:20, 62F

04/13 15:01, 3天前 , 63F
持續哈哈中,依舊拿不出數據
04/13 15:01, 63F

04/13 15:10, 3天前 , 64F
標準文組思維模式,以為什麼都能用自己認知的道理解釋
04/13 15:10, 64F

04/13 15:10, 3天前 , 65F
,不在乎數據帶來的意義
04/13 15:10, 65F

04/14 07:20, 2天前 , 66F
數據就是直升機比較不安全麻,要說各種條件都要同樣
04/14 07:20, 66F

04/14 07:21, 2天前 , 67F
再來做比較,試問你去哪邊找那麼多同條件的直升機坐?
04/14 07:21, 67F

04/14 20:31, 2天前 , 68F
如果直升機比較危險 那醫療跟救援還在用的直升機?
04/14 20:31, 68F

04/14 20:33, 2天前 , 69F
機動性問題啊......
04/14 20:33, 69F

04/15 08:04, 1天前 , 70F
你山上是有跑道膩?當然只能用直升機啊
04/15 08:04, 70F

04/15 19:54, 1天前 , 71F
最近幾年真的超多這種....
04/15 19:54, 71F
文章代碼(AID): #1d-4VDb8 (Aviation)
文章代碼(AID): #1d-4VDb8 (Aviation)