Re: [亞洲] 日本人

看板CultureShock (文化衝擊)作者 (l'Erudit)時間19年前 (2006/08/02 06:43), 編輯推噓2(200)
留言2則, 2人參與, 最新討論串14/15 (看更多)
※ 引述《SVMax (54M無線網路On Line!)》之銘言: : 不管是義大利德國法國美國, : 在戰爭中遭受攻擊彈盡援絕就會投降, : 軍隊也是以保全性命為前提, : 投降也是不得已的。 : 但是日本最後即使已經完全沒有希望, : 還是死不投降, In fact, the situations of Japan and Germany were very different. In Europe, Hilter did not actually surrender the Allies, even the Allies had already invaded Germany, the war did not end until his suicide. Before the war ended, there were some German teenages were push onto the frontlines... For Japan, the Allies have never landed on Japan mainland until the Japanese surrendered. The real reasons drove their surrendering were the atom bombs and USSR's war declaration. Under such situation, the empire was quite clever to surrender immediately, because that was the real hopeless timing. Compare to German, Japanese were not that stupid. You can always blame Japanese declared war in the Asia-Pacific was a mistake. However, it is quite unfair to blame why Japanese did not surrender earlier under the situation that their mainland still not yet been landed and occupied. Similarly, earlier in the WWII, the Great Britain was seriously bombed by German airforce. The British PM said 'I shall never surrender.' Should he be blamed for the same reason? : 甚至使用恐怖的神風攻擊。 : (如果你看過那影片就會知道 :  一架一個人駕駛的自殺戰機可以轟掉一艘航空母艦或戰鬥艦, :  是多恐怖的一件事情。) It is a quite stupid attack style. However, if a suicide fighter plane can sunk or damage a war ship or an aircraft, that means the ship do not do proper defence. The real situation was Japan sent few or a few fighters to bomb the US ships. The fighters carried fuel only for onwards trip and lots of bombs. However, not every fighter could successfully approach the ships under the fires. Even a fighter successfully hits on the ship, it can seriously damage the ship, but can hardly sunk the ship. For a captain of a war ship, there is nothing more terrible than the ship was sunk. Also, I think this cannot be classified as a sort of terror like 911. That was actually between regular forces of two countries involved in a war. And that was not the only example of suicide attack in WWII. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 81.105.111.98 ※ 編輯: lerudit 來自: 81.105.111.98 (08/02 07:21) ※ 編輯: lerudit 來自: 81.105.111.98 (08/02 07:37)

08/03 12:56, , 1F
中肯
08/03 12:56, 1F

08/05 15:09, , 2F
我也覺得戰爭本來就不該輕易投降 尤其是固執的日本人...
08/05 15:09, 2F
文章代碼(AID): #14pzakTk (CultureShock)
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
3
6
完整討論串 (本文為第 14 之 15 篇):
22
41
2
3
1
8
5
8
文章代碼(AID): #14pzakTk (CultureShock)