Re: [北美] 綠卡問題
看板VISA (簽證)作者miluco (I'm feeling lucky)時間17年前 (2008/02/01 12:22)推噓3(3推 0噓 4→)留言7則, 4人參與討論串8/13 (看更多)
※ 引述《JamesC.bbs@ptt3.cc (JamesC)》之銘言:
: 從USCIS網站上就很明確地說明綠卡持有人:
: "Now That You Are A Permanent Resident"
: You may be found to have abandoned your permanent resident status if you:
^^^^^^ 請注意,是may be, 不是 will be
may的意思就是可能會而不是一定會.
這不是文字遊戲,我個人也覺得如果有人
這幾年都以非移民簽證出入美國,他的永久居留權
可能就失效.
因為持綠卡去申請非移民簽證前應該要先放棄綠卡
但是,以往的觀光簽證是不需要每個人去面談的
所以由他人代送的話,那移民局是不是可以把綠卡跟
他國公民的護照連在一起就很難說了.
就整個事件,我其實不希望選舉是一直繞在這種事情上面打轉
不過處理上有瑕疵,反而讓整個事情變得很模糊
最後...綠卡問題...比較適合移民板...畢竟不是"移民簽證"的問題
: * Move to another country intending to live there permanently.
: * Remain outside of the US for more than one year without obtaining a
: reentry permit or returning resident visa. However in determining whether
: your status has been abandoned any length of absence from the US may be
: considered, even if it is less than one year.
: * Remain outside of the US for more than two years after issuance of a
: reentry permit without obtaining a returning resident visa. However in
: determining whether your status has been abandoned any length of absence from
: the US may be considered, even if it is less than one year.
: * Fail to file income tax returns while living outside of the US for any
: period.
: * Declare yourself a nonimmigrant on your tax returns.
: 另外 ChinaPost 也刊出 AIT 官員說 "there are "active" and "passive" procedures to
: abandon the U.S. permanent residence status" 所以主動去取消是 active,
: 因不作為而合乎上面列出的情況則是 "passive" 放棄綠卡...
: 這是美國法令規定與官方解說...至於台灣政治人物要怎麼說
: 那是台灣的事
: http://www.chinapost.com.tw/taiwan/2008/01/30/141106/Ma-urges.htm
※ 編輯: miluco 來自: 208.75.47.123 (02/01 12:23)
推
02/03 06:59, , 1F
02/03 06:59, 1F
→
02/03 07:00, , 2F
02/03 07:00, 2F
→
02/03 10:16, , 3F
02/03 10:16, 3F
→
02/03 10:16, , 4F
02/03 10:16, 4F
→
02/03 10:17, , 5F
02/03 10:17, 5F
推
02/03 13:20, , 6F
02/03 13:20, 6F
推
02/03 16:35, , 7F
02/03 16:35, 7F
討論串 (同標題文章)
VISA 近期熱門文章
PTT美食旅遊區 即時熱門文章
12
28