Re: [亞洲] 那台灣的缺點

看板CultureShock (文化衝擊)作者 (Plastic Angel)時間19年前 (2006/05/13 13:21), 編輯推噓1(100)
留言1則, 1人參與, 最新討論串15/17 (看更多)
※ 引述《lerudit (l'Erudit)》之銘言: : This is not a joke. This is true. : If your cities become a dark hell, no water, no food, your people won't : forgive your kindness. This is cruel and nobody, even you, will be so stupid : to wait to see the day coming. : Of course they won't tell you so in the public, because they need my vote and : also yours. : You can also tell them, hey, you start 'a joke'... : They will then tell themselves, yes, I am going to start a joke, and : I know why. Then they start to defend... Ridiculous,布希發動戰爭搶石油, 當然不是為了選票還有美國未來的能源 (如果是這樣,那他應該是美國的英雄,而不是過街老鼠) 而是因為布希跟美國石油公司(據說副總統跟石油公司更是熟)之間的利益輸送 你說能源吃緊是大家應該要關心的,我100%支持你, 但有很多方法、路子可以去研究、找尋, (參見: Factor Four 這本書) 難不成到時為了石油來個世界大戰也很合理? 就好像假如有一天有個家庭父親對家人家暴, 鄰居跑來說看不過去扁了父親一頓, 走的時候還把珠寶幹走了,只因為這個鄰居"可能會"失業... = =; -- Anyone fool with a dick can make a baby, but only a real man can raise his children. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 220.132.130.102

05/20 21:42, , 1F
為了石油戰爭很合理 二次大戰日本?
05/20 21:42, 1F
文章代碼(AID): #14PMptoB (CultureShock)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #14PMptoB (CultureShock)