Re: [問題] 租屋糾紛

看板NewYork (紐約市)作者 (pei)時間16年前 (2010/06/18 22:15), 編輯推噓0(001)
留言1則, 1人參與, 最新討論串6/6 (看更多)
為了抵制不公 我也是盡量上google找資料了 根據這份Queens Rent Stabilized Building List 目前我住的地方9932 66th Road 是有登記在裡面的 不曉得我是不是能夠享有這些權利 http://www.housingnyc.com/downloads/resources/sta_bldngs/DHCR2007-Queens.pdf ※ 引述《allfar (Greedy)》之銘言: : hi. i don't think your case is applicable under this paragraph. : yours is freely entered lease, and i assume your building is quite new thus : it is not qualified as a rent control apt. : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rent_control_in_New_York#Qualification : 說到底 : 請愛用Google! : ※ 引述《cpl (siri)》之銘言: : : 感謝版友提供如此有用的連結 : : 我剛好在其中一個網頁看到一篇關於冷氣的 : : 但是其中語意並不是百分之百清楚 : : http://www.housingnyc.com/html/resources/dhcr/dhcr27.html : : 裡面這段 : : When the owner purchases and installs a new air conditioner in an occupied rent : : controlled or rent stabilized apartment, after having obtained the written : : consent from the tenant, the owner may charge the tenant one fortieth (1/40th) : : of the cost of the unit, including the installation cost, but excluding the : : finance charges. When the owner purchases and installs a new air conditioner in : : a vacant apartment, tenant consent is not required for the owner to collect the : : increase from the next tenant. This charge becomes part of the Maximum Base : : Rent (MBR) of a rent controlled apartment or the legal regulated rent of a rent : : stabilized apartment. : : 如果我意會沒錯的話 : : 是說房東只能跟我收取租金的四十分之一當作冷氣安裝費嗎 : : 可是不明白excluding the finance charges是甚麼意思 : : 不知道是自己英文不好好還是怎樣 : : 對於很多內容還是不是了解的很清楚 : : 光我自己是不是Rent Stabilized or Rent Controlled都捉模不清楚了 : : 有沒有版友是英文神人可以闡釋一下 >< -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 63.116.201.2 ※ 編輯: irispei 來自: 63.116.201.2 (06/18 22:32)

06/18 22:34, , 1F
歹勢 這是我另一個id
06/18 22:34, 1F
文章代碼(AID): #1C6tzv0P (NewYork)
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 6 之 6 篇):
0
2
5
28
文章代碼(AID): #1C6tzv0P (NewYork)