Re: [其他] 請問西方國家比較不滿台灣人的哪些方面呢?

看板CultureShock (文化衝擊)作者 (l'Erudit)時間18年前 (2006/09/21 03:24), 編輯推噓6(603)
留言9則, 4人參與, 最新討論串11/11 (看更多)
※ 引述《DIVANDCONV (體虛暫不占卜...Orz)》之銘言: : 這只能說是對於隱私的定義不同,樓上有人很正經的回文啦!我就懶得再打了 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ This is correct. However, the point is if you do not know a person very well, should you assume their privacy including more topics or less? This determines you will be liked or disliked, polite or impolite. If you think this is your standard for privacy, and you assume people in the whole world should be the same as you, then you are simply not socialised. The existence of divergence of definition of privacy is not a good excuse for any non-sense question touching the listener's 'privacy'. Polite people always think of others before speaking. By the way, if you do know the person very well, then I believe you know what to do. For people qualified to be refered to 'toi', there can be no privacy nor secret between them. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 81.105.111.98

09/21 18:32, , 1F
感謝國中的英文老師,我還看得懂英文XD我以為都忘了b
09/21 18:32, 1F

09/21 18:32, , 2F
反正,開口前要多思考和觀察對方的反應(笑)
09/21 18:32, 2F

09/21 18:36, , 3F
有些對話技巧,是可以不涉及隱私又可增進友誼的:)
09/21 18:36, 3F

09/21 18:42, , 4F
樓上的 如果你看得懂這英文 那你慘了
09/21 18:42, 4F

09/21 19:48, , 5F
我文法早就死翹翹了~= =;;
09/21 19:48, 5F

09/21 19:48, , 6F
反正單字還看得懂,至少證明當年我有背單字XD
09/21 19:48, 6F

09/22 01:29, , 7F
四樓的,rundown sentence並不是罪大惡極 @@
09/22 01:29, 7F

09/24 22:13, , 8F
文法有錯嗎?@@
09/24 22:13, 8F

09/24 22:13, , 9F
btw~~大推~~既然背景不同 留多一點空間總是好事
09/24 22:13, 9F
文章代碼(AID): #154PMAOt (CultureShock)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #154PMAOt (CultureShock)