Re: [請益] 聽力個位數

看板TOEFL_iBT (TOEFL_iBT托福)作者 (閃. 打. 破兒)時間17年前 (2008/11/11 00:11), 編輯推噓3(306)
留言9則, 4人參與, 最新討論串2/2 (看更多)
有此一說 就是那天北美的機經也有可能是錯誤的 寫機經的有很多沒聽出來 10/18那天的聽力有深度 有很多問題都很難 我是完全不管機經憑自己寫20分 ※ 引述《iamashes (@shes)》之銘言: : 我是10/18的考生, : 成績是 R:24 L:5 S:17 W:21 : 本來想說我聽力已經很爛了, : 沒想到我還是身邊朋友的聽力no.1 囧 : (有一位很扯,她的總分有73分,但聽力只有3分...) : 我們大多都是在10/18考的(聽力分數為1~5分), : 有兩位是在10/12 (一個4分、一個5分) : 我爬過很多文...也寄了信給ET$ (用的是精華區裡有人分享的稿), : 它們的回答如下: : We have received your request to have the Listening section of your October : 18, 2008 TOEFL iBT exam rescored. We regret we cannot comply with your : request to have the Listening section rescored. The rescore service offered : is only available for the Writing and Speaking sections, since these sections : are scored by human raters. The Reading and Listening sections, unlike the : Speaking and Writing, are scored at the test center by the computer. They : undergo a rigorous scoring process in which the Reading and Listening : sections are checked for quality and accuracy at several different stages. : We have, however reviewed your examinee performance record, and can confirm : that your test score is accurate. In your case you did not answer enough : questions correctly to get a higher test score. As stated earlier, the iBT : TOEFL test does not have a question and answer service that would disclose : detailed scoring information that you are requesting. There are many : different versions of the TOEFL iBT. For advice on improving your : English-language skills, please refer to the below. : http://www.ets.org/portal/site/ets/menuitem.1488512ecfd5b8849a77b13bc3921509/?vgnextoid=4dc43d0645428010VgnVCM10000022f95190RCRD&vgnextchannel=fcaf215790d68010VgnVCM10000022f95190RCRD : We hope this information has been helpful and wish you much success in your : future academic endeavors. : Sincerely, : TOEFL iBT Services : 看完信就 ╰(‵皿′*)╯ : 想請問各位...除了接受這樣的回信,難道就沒有別的方法了嗎??? : 我不要求成績可以提高一點, : 但要邪惡的ET$承認錯誤也很難吧。 : 而且我都報了下一次的考試了, : 比第一次報名貴了300...Orz -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 218.172.52.119

11/11 00:29, , 1F
雞精本來就是給背景知識好做準備用的 你的推論有誤
11/11 00:29, 1F

11/11 00:30, , 2F
除非北美雞精附上錯誤答案 看的人考試直接抄上去
11/11 00:30, 2F

11/11 00:30, , 3F
這樣你做的這個推論才有意義
11/11 00:30, 3F

11/11 12:33, , 4F
阿...可是我完全沒看機經,聽力跟其他分數落差這麼大...
11/11 12:33, 4F

11/11 12:33, , 5F
我有看北美雞精,不過看了也是大概知道大意而已
11/11 12:33, 5F

11/11 12:34, , 6F
我覺得聽力有沒有看機精其實差別不大
11/11 12:34, 6F

11/11 12:35, , 7F
因為聽力那麼一長串,考試時有聽清楚才是重點
11/11 12:35, 7F

11/11 12:35, , 8F
而且我覺得10/18考很多細節題O__Q
11/11 12:35, 8F

11/12 02:23, , 9F
沒錯當你去想機經或是想那個大概就會影響你了
11/12 02:23, 9F
文章代碼(AID): #1965qxfx (TOEFL_iBT)
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
22
32
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):
22
32
文章代碼(AID): #1965qxfx (TOEFL_iBT)